AI Harness Engineer (OpenClaw/Hermes) - stabilise & harden agent system

@tangramua

Hello,   We carefully studied the description of your project and we can confirm that we understand your needs and are also interested in your project. Our team has the necessary resources to start your project as soon as possible and complete it in a very short time.   We are 25 years in this business and our technical specialists have strong experience in Linux, VPS, Security, DevOps, Wireguard, AI Development, AI Agents, OpenClaw, AI Integration, AI Automation and other technologies relevant to your project.   Please, review our profile https://www.freelancer.com/u/tangramua where you can find detailed information about our company, our portfolio, and the client's recent reviews.   Please contact us via Freelancer Chat to discuss your project in details.    Best regards, Sales department Tangram Canada Inc.     

@k1ng440

A multi-agent harness with tool access on a VPS means one bad prompt or one dependency drift can take the whole host with it, and I'd bet the stabilise in your title is mostly about that drift. Assuming the agents already work and the operations around them don't, my guess at the usual trio is: restarts that lose in-flight state, no visibility into which agent ran which tool call, and permissions far broader than anything actually needs. I do the boring instrumentation work first. At a crypto platform in London I was lead engineer across 20+ microservices, and MTTR came down 60% once Datadog and OpenTelemetry were in place before anything got touched. Same instinct here. You can't stabilise what you can't see. Then containment. Audit what each agent can actually reach, put tool calls behind a local bridge instead of handing agents raw host access, and make sure credentials never end up in log output. What's breaking first, the agents dropping mid-run, or the box itself?

@Hubready

Hello!, I am a US-based senior software engineer and this project stands out because the real pain point is not adding more AI, but making the current harness stable, predictable, and safe under VPS constraints. I’ve worked on production systems where one flaky process, bad retry loop, or weak network boundary can break the whole stack, so I focus on hardening first, then optimizing. For this OpenClaw + Hermes setup, I’d approach it in phases: 1. Audit the runtime, logs, process flow, and failure points 2. Tighten security, service isolation, permissions, and Wireguard/network handling 3. Stabilize orchestration, retries, timeouts, and recovery behavior 4. Add observability so issues are caught early 5. Test on the VPS and document a clear runbook I’m the kind of engineer who pays attention to the small details that usually get missed, especially when the goal is a reliable multi-agent harness rather than a demo that only works once. Could you please clarify the following questions to help me better understand the project? 1. What is currently failing most often: startup, agent coordination, networking, or security-related issues? 2. Are you expecting code changes in OpenClaw/Hermes, or mainly deployment and hardening on the VPS? 3. Do you already have logs, architecture notes, or a reproduction path for the instability? Relevant work includes internal AI automation tools, a self-hosted workflow agent for a logistics team, a secure VPS-based monitoring stack, and a

@corpmember29

Hello, Self-Hosted OpenClaw / AI Infrastructure {{{ I HAVE HANDS-ON EXPERIENCE WITH SELF-HOSTED AI AGENTS, MCP, LINUX/macOS DEVOPS, PRIVATE NETWORKING AND AUTOMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, AND CAN WORK WITH YOUR EXISTING ARCHITECTURE WITHOUT RE-ARCHITECTING IT. }}} I have 11+ years of experience and can first stabilize the current OpenClaw/Hermes setup, then implement gateway access control, memory/KB permissions, vetted skills, cost metering, model routing, encrypted backups, audit logging, emergency stop, Tailscale device controls and Mac mini → VPS migration. For the paid trial, I can focus on backup/restore validation and heartbeat health monitoring with escalation. Screening answer: I first check scheduler/cron state, gateway and channel health, process/container status, logs and timestamps, provider/API errors, credentials/rate limits, then run the brief manually and verify delivery. I notify the owner after initial diagnosis, provide status updates during remediation, and document the root cause and prevention steps. I can provide relevant work/reference details under NDA. Thanks, Christina

@carlosd178

Hello, After reviewing your requirements, I understand you need someone to stabilize and harden an existing self-hosted AI agent infrastructure while expanding its security, automation, and operational reliability. I have experience with Linux VPS, DevOps, security hardening, Docker-based deployments, private networking (WireGuard/Tailscale), AI integrations, automation workflows, and production infrastructure management. I can help improve gateway reliability, access control, backups, monitoring, secrets management, and the Mac mini to VPS migration with controlled Git-based changes. My approach is to first audit the current setup, create health checks, backup/restore procedures, and operational documentation before implementing additional features. For the scheduled brief issue, I would check in this order: 1. Verify the scheduler/cron/heartbeat status and recent logs. 2. Check gateway/service health and provider/API connectivity. 3. Review credentials, permissions, and recent configuration changes. 4. Test the workflow manually and restore service safely. I would immediately inform the owner with the impact, findings, and next steps rather than making unapproved production changes. A quick question: • Do you already have monitoring and centralized logs in place, or should this be included in the initial stabilization phase? I can work with your Git PR workflow and security requirements. Best regards, Carlos.

@HamparProd

SPARKY I take over existing systems before changing them: map current config, reproduce failures, establish acceptance tests, then make small reviewable PRs. Incident answer: I first confirm whether the brief was scheduled at all: automation/cron state, heartbeat registration, last successful run, and gateway logs. Next I check agent/session routing, provider/model availability, credentials/caps, tool failures, and whether the run completed but delivery failed at the messaging channel. I compare against the last known-good config and run the brief manually in a controlled session. I tell the owner as soon as I confirm impact: what failed, whether data is safe, the current workaround, and when the next update will be. I restore service first, then document root cause, add a regression test/alert, and only close the incident after the next scheduled run succeeds automatically.

@naminghn

Hi there, I've noted that your self-hosted AI harness requires significant stabilization and improvements, specifically around multi-user gateways and memory management. My extensive hands-on experience with OpenClaw and the integration of private networks like Tailscale aligns perfectly with your needs. I can effectively enhance the agent system to ensure robust performance and responsive maintenance. You can also expect timely updates and a structured approach using Kanban for task management. I'm keen to discuss the technicalities further, especially regarding your existing architecture and any specific tools you prefer for integration. Regards, Ali

@nicolasarmandoc

Hi, For a silent scheduled-brief failure, I’d first check the scheduler/cron or heartbeat state and recent gateway logs, then verify the agent process, provider configuration, channel connectivity, and whether the task actually executed but failed during generation or delivery. I’d trace one failed run end-to-end rather than restarting services blindly, preserving logs before making changes. I’d tell the owner within the first check-in that the brief is missing, confirm whether it is isolated or systemic, and provide an initial status and next action as soon as I have evidence. Once identified, I’d fix the underlying issue, rerun the specific job safely, and document the failure and prevention step in the runbook. I can provide relevant OpenClaw/Hermes work and a business reference during screening. I’d also follow your PR-only workflow and keep changes small and reviewable. Nicolas

@lazarr4

Hello, I can stabilize your OpenClaw/Hermes system by focusing on the core reliability gaps—like the scheduled briefs—while adding the multi-user controls and cost metering you need. I’ve helped a SaaS team harden their agent system by setting up strict Tailscale ACLs and automated backup scripts, which cut incident response time by 40%. I’d approach this by building a role-based gateway with encrypted sessions and versioned skills, then layering cost controls on top of existing provider configs. The biggest wins will come from hardening the backup/restore process and automating device onboarding. This setup will reduce operational overhead while keeping costs predictable for your team. I’ll also document every step in runbooks so your team can handle future issues without relying on me. Once the system is stable, I’ll leave you with clear documentation and a troubleshooting guide. If this approach makes sense, I’m happy to discuss the backup and restore scope first. Thanks, Lazar.

@Solutionzhere

SolutionzHere can execute your stabilisation roadmap with PR-only delivery, explicit approvals and EU-overlap. We will begin with the paid one-week trial: encrypted backup, documented tested restore, heartbeat health check, escalation path and incident runbook. Then we can harden gateway sessions, RBAC, per-user memory boundaries, versioned skills/MCP controls, metering, auditability, Tailscale ACL/device lifecycle and zero-downtime container migration. For a missed morning brief, I check job state and scheduler/cron enablement, gateway and channel logs, provider auth/rate limits, network/DNS, then the specific run trace and delivery permissions. OpenClaw heartbeats depend on enabled automations and expose jobs through openclaw cron list --all; Tailscale supports ACL, posture and configuration audit controls. Can you confirm EU data-residency and preferred overlap hours?

@hayteekeys

HI, KINDLY READ THROUGH MY PROPOSAL I will stabilise your existing OpenClaw + Hermes multi-agent harness and then build the multi-user gateway, controlled memory, skills, cost metering, encrypted backups, Tailscale device management and Mac-to-VPS migration without downtime. MY APPROACH ✅ Hardening of current headless Mac mini setup and scheduled agents ✅ Multi-user gateway with roles, shared/private sessions and clean on/offboarding ✅ Versioned skills, MCP integration, cost metering and model routing with caps ✅ Encrypted backups with tested restores, audit log and emergency stop ✅ Tailscale ACL management and zero-downtime migration to Linux VPS SCREENING ANSWER (under 150 words) Check in this order: 1) Agent process still running (launchd/cron status). 2) Last successful heartbeat / log timestamp. 3) Provider API key validity and rate-limit errors. 4) Channel connectivity (messaging token, network/Tailscale). 5) Disk / memory pressure and recent config or skill changes. Tell the owner within 15–30 minutes: “Morning brief failed; root cause is X; temporary workaround applied / investigating; ETA for fix is Y.” Escalate immediately if it affects customer-facing output. QUESTIONS 1. Preferred start window for the paid trial ? 2. Current OpenClaw / Hermes version and primary messaging channel? 3. Ready to proceed with NDA + DPA so reference and detailed access can follow? Ready to begin the written screening and reference step as soon as you confirm.

@emilesd617

Hi, I am an AI infrastructure and DevOps engineer with 8 years of rich experience in software development, with a background in self-hosted agent systems and private server networks. I am familiar with OpenClaw, Hermes, AI Agents, MCP, Linux, VPS, macOS (launchd), Ollama, Docker, Tailscale, WireGuard, DevOps, Security, Git, etc. I'd start with the paid trial: encrypted, scheduled backups with a documented and tested restore, and a health-check heartbeat that escalates to the owner when a gateway, cron job or channel goes quiet. From there, I'd work through your Kanban in small, reviewable PRs covering the multi-user gateway and roles, per-member access to memory and the knowledge base, versioned skills, cost metering with enforced caps, scoped credentials with an audit log and emergency stop, Tailscale ACLs with device on/offboarding, and a zero-downtime move from the Mac minis to hardened containers on the VPS, each with golden tests and runbooks. I'm an individual freelancer and can work on any time zone you want. Please contact me with the best time for you to have a quick chat. Looking forward to discussing more details. Thanks. Emile.

@devitmd98

Hi, I'm Mihail, a versatile and experienced full-stack web developer with a remarkable skill set that includes AI Development and DevOps among others. With over a decade in the industry, I've honed my abilities in managing large-scale applications, fostering collaboration with diverse teams, and ensuring projects are not only delivered on time but fit for purpose. My expertise in AI development makes me confident in my ability to stabilize and enhance your OpenClaw/Hermes-based multi-agent AI system, aligning it to the architecture blueprint you've provided. I believe that the key strength of an effective web developer lies in their capability to tackle challenges head-on and communicate clearly throughout projects. Having previously operated private networks and infrastructure similar to yours using tools like Tailscale, NetBird, and ZeroTier, I am no stranger to maintaining secure and efficient systems. My responsiveness is top-notch - allowing me to address incidents immediately while providing proactive status updates. In line with your work process, I rely on effective communication, timely reporting through short weekly syncs and self-reviewable PRs. But most importantly, I take client confidentiality very seriously; stringent adherence to NDAs has always been paramount in my field. Let's embrace the transformative power of AI together.

@FizzaNadeemK

I can handle the OpenClaw/Hermes setup, Tailscale, macOS/Linux DevOps, backups, monitoring, and hardening, with changes kept small and reviewable through your PR process. For a missed morning brief, I’d check the scheduler/cron, gateway and channel logs, provider/model status, credentials and recent config changes first; I’d update you as soon as I isolate the cause and keep you posted until the brief is restored and the issue is documented.

@emrahg7

Hi, Whether this holds up long term comes down to the credential and permission layer under the multi-agent gateway. If member roles, scoped keys, and access control aren't nailed down before you scale users and skills, every other piece (memory, cost caps, audit logs) inherits that weakness. I'd start there: lock down scoped credentials and roles first, then layer the rest on top with tests that prove it holds. On the dropped morning brief: I'd check the scheduler/cron log first, then the agent's last heartbeat, then provider/API status, then message delivery logs, in that order. Owner gets a status note within the hour, cause identified or not. I've run private device networks with Tailscale for small teams before, and the mac-to-VPS migration without downtime is the kind of work I like doing carefully. I can start on the paid trial scope right away. Best, Emrah

@nintysix96

Bid amount and timeline shown are rough placeholders, we'll pin those down once we've had a look at what's actually running. What you've got is a working OpenClaw/Hermes harness that talks to your team over messaging, pulls from Notion, Drive and mail, and runs scheduled briefs, but it's grown to the point where the gaps are starting to matter. You need someone to harden what's live, finish what's half-built, and get the whole thing migrated from Mac minis to a Linux VPS without dropping anything in the process. The finish line is a system where new members can be onboarded cleanly, incidents have runbooks, backups are actually tested, and nothing sits exposed on the public internet. Here's how we'd approach this: - Stabilise and audit: walk every running component, map what's fragile, write the missing runbooks, and get a golden test set in place before touching anything structural. - Multi-user gateway and access control: per-member sessions, roles, and clean on/offboarding wired into OpenClaw's channel and rules layer, shared and private session handling included. - Memory and knowledge base: shared store with per-member scoping, MCP tool integration, versioned skills with a review gate before anything goes live. - Cost metering and model routing: per-task and per-member tracking, cloud vs local routing with hard caps, no billing surprises. - VPS migration: containerised services, hardened Linux, Tailscale ACLs locked down, scoped credentials, secrets managed properly, done in slices so the live system keeps running throughout. After a short call to walk through what's already built and where the fires are, we'll put together a written proposal with milestones, deliverables and firm pricing. Would a 15 minute scope chat work this week? Just want to make sure we're aligned on priorities before quoting firm numbers. Best, 96 Studio

@edgardop86

Hello, this project's need to stabilize and then build out multi-user capabilities for your OpenClaw harness aligns well with my background. We can focus on practical steps like containerization for the Mac mini to VPS migration, ensuring a smooth transition as I did when improving page load from 3.4s to 2.2s. My approach emphasizes robust infrastructure and clear guardrails for your agent environment. Happy to discuss scope and timing.

@AITSoft

Hi, I understand you need the existing OpenClaw/Hermes setup stabilised first, then hardened without changing the agreed architecture. I would work through small Git PRs, acceptance tests, and clear runbooks. My approach would cover the backup and restore trial first, then health checks, escalation, access controls, audit logs, cost limits, Tailscale device controls, and the Mac mini to Linux VPS move. I can work within your rule that production changes and credentials remain under your approval, with no data leaving your systems. My Linux and VPS work includes secure services, secrets, logging, monitoring, and controlled migrations, while Automation helps keep scheduled jobs and failure alerts reliable. I can also document checks for the morning brief issue in the required order and provide relevant work links and a business reference during screening. For the screening case: I would check the scheduler and heartbeat, process and service logs, provider/API status, credentials, network path, queue state, and recent configuration changes. I would tell the owner after the first checks, give an initial cause and recovery estimate, then confirm the fix and prevention steps. Which OpenClaw gateway, scheduler, and logging components currently run on the Mac minis, and what health signals are already available?

@mayr81

I can help stabilise and harden your existing OpenClaw/Hermes-based harness without disrupting the architecture or bypassing your review process. The scope aligns closely with production agent operations: multi-user gateway controls, governed skills and MCP integrations, per-task cost limits, encrypted backups with restore validation, auditability, emergency controls, Tailscale device lifecycle, and a controlled Mac-to-Linux VPS migration. For a silently missed scheduled morning brief, I would check in order: scheduler/cron or heartbeat execution, gateway and channel health, provider authentication and rate limits, model/provider routing, skill and integration logs, delivery/API responses, and host resources or recent configuration changes. I would reproduce safely where possible, preserve logs, and identify the last successful checkpoint. I would tell the owner promptly that the brief is delayed, provide an initial status and containment plan the same day, then share confirmed cause, impact, recovery, and prevention steps as evidence emerges. I am comfortable working through small PRs, acceptance-tested Kanban tickets, runbooks, golden tests, and strict infrastructure-only access under NDA/DPA. Relevant OpenClaw/Hermes work, production references, and the requested business contact can be provided during screening.